The above-linked post is a perceptive one, and he makes some points worth pondering about Obama, and how his -- shall we say -- singular upbringing leads him to a rather odd perspective on America and American identity.
Much of what I have read about Obama's relationship with his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, and about her leftist notions about her country of birth, leads to the inescapable conclusion that neither of them have a normal and natural love of America or of American people. Is this what we want in a President, especially a President who makes big claims about 'uniting' the American people?
Lao cites a Mona Charen article in which Obama relates the disputes between his mother and her Indonesian second husband, referred to as Lolo:
"Looking back, I'm not sure Lolo ever fully understood what my mother was going through ... why the things he was working so hard to provide for her seemed only to increase the distance between them ... He landed a job in the government relations department of an American oil company. ... Sometimes I would overhear him and my mother arguing in their bedroom, usually about her refusal to attend his company dinner parties, where American businessmen from Texas and Louisiana would slap Lolo's back and boast about the palms they had greased to obtain the new offshore drilling rights, while their wives complained to my mother about the quality of Indonesian help. He would ask her how it would look for him to go alone, and remind her that these were her own people, and my mother's voice would rise to almost a shout."
"They are not my people!"
What a telling phrase.
It's not surprising, given mama Stanley Ann's oddball leftist ideals and her predilection for selecting 'diverse' husbands or paramours. Lao then follows with a quote from Herodotus:
''Herodotus once said that "If anyone, no matter who, were given the opportunity of choosing from amongst all the nations in the world the set of beliefs which he thought best, he would inevitably - after careful considerations of their relative merits - choose that of his own country."
A young mulatto abandoned by his black Kenyan father and cared for by his white American mother, an anthropologist and Islamophile who hated America and subsequently went native. We may never completely understand the pathological self-criticism that Obama holds deep down in his soul, the overwhelming guilt that consumes him or the messianic aspirations that he now seems to revel in.
What we do know is that in Plato's Euthyphro, Socrates would advance argument that piety to many gods, who all want conflicting devotions is impossible.''
Something to think about there. Multiculturalism and 'diversity' amount to trying to worship at many altars, and trying to divide our devotion and loyalty among them all. Of course we all know that; those of us with our eyes open realize this.
The real issue here, for me, is: how can a man with such idiosyncratic allegiances and ideas and background pretend to represent America, historic America, old America? He can't. He doesn't. He won't. He will only be President of the changeling America, the proposition nation impostor that is now being surreptitiously put in the place of the original America. Most of us are the people Obama's mother repudiates and disowns; can Obama be true to his exotic roots and still be the President of the people Stanley Ann Dunham despises?
Early in Obama's candidacy, somebody, I forget who, said that Obama was an anomaly in that he had had the least American upbringing and background of any candidate in our history. Maybe that is what so many of the multicultists see in Obama: he represents change, just as he says. Change, as in presto, change-o: a new America, with a new population who will no doubt be more to the liking of Stanley Ann and Barack.
5 comments:
Hey VA...ok I agree 100% with your thesis...Obama is being embraced cuz he represents the "new America"...out with the old..in with the new. However, this specific example is a bad one. Obama's mother when she says "They are not my people!" is correct. Those businessmen are not our people VA. They are the Bushes and the Clintons. They are the traitors. They are the ones who sold out their country for monetary gain. The wives that criticize the Indonesian Help are not our people. (In my opinion, maids should be outlawed) Seriously, the people described in this paragraph are the Cheney's from the 60's...the very ones that turned their back on their ancestors. We have a war going with our own people, and Obama's mother was reacting to that war by embracing the 'other.'
My compisition professor (who is a Spaniard) spent an hour talking to me after class. His thoughts on Obama, word for word, "If he gets elected, shit, there goes the US." Mine, too!
TLD hits the point well. We can interpret "tall" tales any way we want for effect. Even Obama can spin his own tales for effect.
Who the heck are MY people? Well, Im stuck with all of you so you are all my people - but it doesnt mean I have to sip cocktails and make small talk with ALL of you.
I have to agree with TLD in that the off-shore oil folks and other international business people are not our people, but neither is Obama's mother "our people." They are both at war against our people, the real people of America.
The big-money internationalist and the one-world Leftists are both trying to destroy the America that has allowed our people to flourish and enjoy the freedom to live, work and worship for the past 225 years. Right now, these two seemingly incompatible enemies of ours have allied themselves against us, and they are working hand in glove to bring us down. It is important to recognize that neither one of them are our people.
In this regard, it ought to be evident that none, that's right, none at all, of the candidates being put forward by the Dems and the Republicans are "our people." They are all people from the far left, including McCain, they all favor population replacement, wealth redistribution, and all of the other ideals of the left. The only difference at all is that McBomb wants to continue the war in Iraq whereas the Dems, both of them, want to bring it to a speedy end. Not much difference over all.
It is time for us to elect one of our people, some one that represents us. Consider some one from outside this broken, two party system. Look at the Constitution Party, the Libertarian Party, or something else. We have to get a way from the mess we are in and get one of "our people" elected to be President.
TLD - I take your point but I think we can see Stanley Ann's attitude in the choices she consistently made: marrying the most exotic men she could find (what says rejection of your own more than marrying 'out'?) which remember, was not so easy to do in 1960 in America. I remember that time, and our country was majority white, especially Mercer Island, Washington where Stanley Ann went to high school. The floodgates had not yet been opened by the 1965 Immigration Act. In other words, you would really have had to search to find yourself such an exotic mate as Stanley Ann did -- not once but twice.
Anybody who made the choices she made was down on America and Americans, and not just the upper middle class or wealthy greedheads she may have encountered in their situation.
flippityfloppity - I agree that Obama may not be telling 100 percent truthful tales in his self-serving book; I actually believe him about as much as I believe the mendacious Clintons and their fanciful stories of their pasts. But I think the facts tell the story of Miss Stanley Ann; she is a multicultist and not one who loves her fellow Americans in general; she is one of those leftists probably who hates the rich cosmopolitans AND the poor white folks back home because they are ignorant. She's an elitist like most leftists are, from what I can discern.
-VA
Post a Comment