Certainly Irish people should have a 'right', if one can say anyone has a right, to emigrate to Canada. Apparently the economy in Ireland is such that jobs are hard to come by -- which only makes it more vexing to read how Ireland is now receiving large numbers of immigrants from the so-called 'developing' (read: backward) countries. In a sane world, mass immigration would not be allowed to proceed when a country has large numbers of unemployed, and in fact, would not be allowed even in healthier economic times. But this is not a sane world, a fact which most of us can't fail to notice these days.
Emigrating to Canada for employment may be a good deal for the individual from Ireland who has a needed skill. But what of the unemployed Canadian citizen? As usual, it seems that the imported labor will be paid less than a prospective employee who is a native. Cheaper labor is one of the factors which entices business to support mass immigration.
Also, there are plenty of unemployed Americans with good skills who would be happy to be offered the chance to work in Canada; why not hire closer to home?
I believe the powers-that-be are intent on playing this game of scrambling the world's populations to the maximum. They want to bring the peoples of the Third World to live in the First, so as to level everyone down, eventually, and even more, it seems they want to genetically scramble everybody together into an amorphous mass, with a worldwide uniculture (hailed as 'enriched').
From an Irish point of view, this scheme should be viewed suspiciously. The more native Irish people who are scattered to the four winds, the weaker the national culture of Ireland becomes, and the more attenuated national identity and heritage becomes. The fewer native Irish people in Ireland, the better to accommodate the numbers of immigrants from various places. Ireland becomes less Irish, and the people who remain behind there will be all the more quickly swamped by the immigrants and 'refugees' who are arriving daily.
From the Canadian point of view, will the arrival of Irish workers help shore up their traditional European-based culture?
The Globe and Mail article says
''With its steady economy, common language, similar training and work standards – not to mention shared history – Canada is one of a handful a popular destinations for Irish workers.''
Nothing is mentioned in that quote about culture, much less race or ethnicity (as we would expect). But as Canada is trying to transform itself into some showplace of diversity, it would not seem that the Irish would feel any more at home there than in some other 'diverse' Western country, all of which increasingly show a drab sameness in their 'enrichment.' The Irish will be swallowed up by all this diversity there, as they may be in Ireland, unless things change.
So the game of musical chairs, choreographed by the powers-that-be, goes on everywhere. Eastern Europeans leave their countries in droves, going to the British Isles, where they set up enclaves.
I suppose this is the point where I diverge sharply with the average WN. If I believed that skin color trumps ethnic origins and loyalties, I might think this is all just fine. But as I don't believe that all people who fall under the category of White are interchangeable, I don't see this game of mix and match as a good thing. The powers-that-be, the people in charge, see this as a desirable thing; that's why they are promoting it. The fact that they are promoting it should give us a clue that it is not in our best interests.
Ethnicity, kinship ties, culture, all of these things matter. Every time there is a mass movement of people from one part of the world to another, or even from one region to another (as in our country, North vs. South), kinship ties are weakened. The culture is weakened. Our heritage becomes attenuated and threadbare. People can't be moved around like furniture.
The globalist agenda would like to transfer populations everywhere, creating a sense of anomie and rootlessness and a lack of cohesion and attachment to place.
We are aiding the globalist agenda when we go along with this, and behave as if we can uproot and choose flight from our problems.
And although some believe that we should drop all distinctions between all peoples who are roughly the same race, I don't see the merit of this; I see mostly the downside. The smaller and narrower allegiances are more natural. We can only closely identify with a relatively few people, those closer to us, those who speak our language and who also have some common experiences and history with us.
Some White ethnic groups are naturally more compatible with us, and some far less compatible. We only have to look at the various ethnic conflicts in Europe and in our country -- among Whites -- to see that skin tone is not enough to give people a sense of unity. Let's not erase all distinctions, and thereby unwittingly help the globalists accomplish their designs.
