Again, judges thwart the express will of the people, with their ruling in favor of a mosque being built in Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Read another (typically biased) story from the Tennessean here. The pro-Islam slant is so blatant, one would think that 'journalists' would be embarrassed by this lack of pretense to objectivity. The point of view is one-sidedly that of the 'Islamic community'. The victimhood template in action.
The Tennessean requires a subscription. You would think they would make some effort to serve their majority customer/reader base, which is probably mostly White and Christian. I realize Tennessee has been heavily colonized by people from the four corners of the globe, but I would bet that most of the Tennessean's paying readership consists of White American citizens, not 'new Americans' who may not even read English -- or any language. To the Tennessean staff: good luck with trying to keep your paper afloat by catering to non-English-speaking, non-readers. The White readership which is your customer base is being undermined and ethnically cleansed, with your enthusiastic support. So you are putting yourselves out of business. That's not smart.
Now, where is the commenter who chided me a while back about being
'hard' on Islam? If anything, I've said too little about it in recent
months and years. It should be obvious to anybody who pays attention
that Islam and its adherents are determined to colonize our country as
well as other Western countries, with a view to establishing their
culture and 'religion' as the dominant one. Their spokesmen and leaders
have been arrogantly proclaiming this for years now. How some people can
deny this and support the idea that Islam is benign or even neutral
towards us is unfathomable to me.
I realize that a part of this denial is the delusion that the 'enemy of my enemy is my friend.' This is an idiotic belief. I know that some people insist that 'Jew propaganda' is the source of any opposition to Islam. This is just not accurate. Islam and Christendom have been at odds ever since the former came into existence. Our ancestors recognized the incompatibility of Islam with Christendom, and acted on their belief without any outside propaganda or influence.
To oppose or object to Islam's presence is not being a 'dupe of the Jews', but is just a realistic response to Islam's aggressive designs against our countries. However this does not mean that we have to support wars in the Middle East or involvement in their affairs. We should stay out of that part of the world, in exchange for Moslems staying out of our countries, and refraining from colonizing us and trying to change our way of life to cater to them, as in this Murfreesboro case. If they wish to practice their religion they can do so in the many Moslem countries which are theirs. We cannot practice the Christian faith in their countries; why must we extend to them a privilege which we are not granted in their countries?
And are the good people of Tennessee going to quietly acquiesce to this kind of disregard of their rights and their collective will? We will see if there is any of the spirit of our forebears left in the South.